The Dual Role of KIP-Kuliah in Enabling and Constraining Low-Income Students Thriving in Indonesian Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70437/ijoed.v2i3.315Keywords:
KIP-Kuliah , low-income students, thriving, Indonesian higher educationAbstract
In Indonesia, the Kartu Indonesia Pintar Kuliah (KIP-Kuliah) scholarship program is a vital investment to support low-income students in higher education. While crucial for access, there remains limited understanding of how this aid affects students’ holistic development beyond mere enrollment or persistence. This study investigates how KIP-Kuliah influences key dimensions of student thriving (academic engagement, psychological well-being, and social connectedness) while also identifying implementation barriers that may hinder its full potential. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data from 386 scholarship recipients were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), complemented by qualitative insights from essay-style narratives with 79 participants, analyzed through reflexive thematic analysis. KIP-Kuliah significantly predicted greater academic engagement (β=.45), psychological well-being (β=.38), and social connectedness (β=.40). The reduction of financial stress partially mediated these relationships, explaining 44–58% of the total effects. However, implementation challenges, including disbursement delays (affecting 40% of recipients), insufficient stipends (22%), and perceived stigma (28%) significantly weakened these benefits. Qualitative themes highlighted underlying mechanisms such as cognitive liberation, social capital accumulation, and enhanced psychological security. KIP-Kuliah serves as a powerful enabling mechanism that can unlock low-income students’ capacity for holistic success. However, its effectiveness is highly dependent on the quality of implementation. To maximize impact, policymakers and institutions must ensure timely disbursement, provide adequate living support, and foster inclusive campus environments that actively reduce stigma.
References
Aries, E., & Seider, M. (2005). The interactive relationship between class identity and the college experience: The case of lower income students. Qualitative Sociology, 28(4), 419–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-005-8366-1
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Deming, D. J., & Dynarski, S. (2010). Into college, out of poverty? Policies to increase the postsecondary attainment of the poor. In Targeting investments in children: Fighting poverty when resources are limited (pp. 283–302). University of Chicago Press.
Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D., Oishi, S., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y
Dynarski, S., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2013). Financial aid policy: Lessons from research. The Future of Children, 23(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0002
Fadhil, I., & Sabic-El-Rayess, A. (2021). Providing equity of access to higher education in Indonesia: A policy evaluation. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3 (1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10376
Goldrick-Rab, S. (2016). Paying the price: College costs, financial aid, and the betrayal of the American dream. University of Chicago Press.
Goldrick-Rab, S., Kelchen, R., Harris, D. N., & Benson, J. (2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121 (6), 1762–1817. https://doi.org/10.1086/685442
Jack, A. A. (2019). The privileged poor: How elite colleges are failing disadvantaged students. Harvard University Press.
Lee, R. M., & Robbins, S. B. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42 (2), 232–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.2.232
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Marginson, S. (2011). Higher education and public good. Higher Education Quarterly, 65 (4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2011.00496.x
Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76 (5), 485–518. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0036
Prawitz, A. D., Garman, E. T., Sorhaindo, B., O’Neill, B., Kim, J., & Drentea, P. (2006). In Charge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale: Development, administration, and score interpretation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 17 (1), 34–50.
Putri, N. K. B. A., Wijaya, K. A., & Wirantari, I. D. P. (2025). Implementasi Program Kartu Indonesia Pintar (KIP) Kuliah Merdeka dalam Mewujudkan Pemerataan Pendidikan Tinggi (Studi Kasus: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Udayana). IJESPG Journal.
Schreiner, L. A. (2010). The “Thriving Quotient”: A New Vision for Student Success. About Campus: Enriching the Student Learning Experience, 15, 2-10.
https://doi.org/10.1002/abc.20016
Tinto, V. (2012). Completing college: Rethinking institutional action. University of Chicago Press.
Schreiner, L. A. (2013). Thriving in college. New Directions for Student Services, (143), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20059
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Downloads
Published
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yamin Liu, Elva Retnawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
